AI-powered tools are revolutionising the creative industry, impacting the work of graphic designers, writers, and artists. Are they a positive development that will help meet the ever increasing demand for creative content or an existential threat to our working practices and professions?
Open AI's Chat GPT-4 technology
As AI-powered tools become increasingly sophisticated, they are capable of generating content on demand, often indistinguishable from a human artist. This poses both opportunities and challenges for creative professionals, raising questions about the future role of human creators and the ethical implications of AI-generated works.
AI-powered tools, like OpenAI's GPT-4, have the ability to generate human-like content based on minimal prompts. This technology is revolutionising the way content is written by streamlining the content generation process.
People can now rely on AI to generate written content quickly and efficiently. Language models can analyse vast amounts of data to understand context, tone, and style, allowing them to produce coherent and engaging posts and articles.
However, as the web gets flooded with AI generated articles that aren't fact checked, the credibility and trustworthiness of the information we consume should be called into question. As creative professionals we are responsible for the quality and accuracy of the information we produce.
Midjourney image generation
Image generators, such as DALL-E and Midjourney, are shaking up the creative industry, especially in professions like photography and graphic design.
The image making process is automated, which offers a new level of convenience and productivity, allowing designers and photographers to produce high-quality visuals within seconds. However, mastering the art of textual prompts is critical to achieving successful outcomes.
Simple textual descriptions can create stunning and realistic images but they aren't always appropriate for a project and it is difficult to fine tune them. One might argue that image generators are more exciting than spending hours trawling through stock photo libraries but they can still be time consuming to use.
I can understand why mounting pressures might tempt some creatives to use generated images without further editing but I believe that the unique perspectives of human artists and designers are integral to the creative process. Image generators should be seen as a complementary resource that enhances the creative experience, rather than a replacement for human skills.
Relying solely on AI tools for content creation raises ethical implications and challenges. The risk of AI-generated content being indistinguishable from human-created content raises concerns about authenticity and transparency. It could also devalue our professions.
I am concerned that over-dependence on AI may also stifle human creativity, as it is something that needs to be regularly practiced. When I took a break from graphic design during lock-down, it took a while for my brain to become well versed in generating ideas and creative solutions once more. I liken it to going to the gym, if you value your fitness and physique, you can't stop exercising, as your fitness will diminish and your muscles will atrophy.
The importance of human interaction in the creative process
Human interaction in the creative process has long been the driving force behind the most remarkable works of art, design, and writing. It is the unique combination of skills, imagination, and experiences that make the creative professions so highly regarded. However, with the advent of AI-powered tools and generative models, the role of human creators is being challenged.
These tools are capable of producing impressive and realistic images, generating music, and even creating written content on demand. While these advancements undoubtedly offer new possibilities, they also pose a potential threat to the jobs and livelihoods of creative professionals.
The fear is that with the capabilities of AI in content generation and design, the need for human skills such as critical thinking, originality, and emotional expression may diminish.
Human artists possess unique skills and capabilities that cannot be replicated by AI. The ability to think critically, apply emotional intelligence, and draw from personal experiences allows human creators to produce art that elicits genuine emotions and inspires action. Whether it's a thought-provoking piece of writing, a visually stunning graphic design, or a captivating piece of music, the human touch remains unrivalled.
The value of human-created content is a result of personal experiences, emotions, and perspectives. Artists, designers, and writers draw from their own unique backgrounds and interpret the world through their individual lens. They convey meaning, symbolism, and depth in their work, using their understanding of human emotions and cultural context.
It is important to recognise the limitations of AI in the realm of creativity. AI may excel at replicating famous artists, mimicking art styles, and generating surreal images, but it struggles to replicate the complexity of human thought and emotion. There is a limit to its ability to convey meaning and to understand symbolism. While AI-generated content may be efficient and effective at producing mass quantities of art, it lacks the depth and nuance that human creativity brings.
The artist's experiences, emotions, and perspectives are expressed through his art
In the face of advancing AI technology, it is crucial for creative professionals to adapt their skills and embrace the potential benefits. However, as a graphic designer and web developer, AI technologies have felt a bit like a landslide, they have been all consuming.
I have watched as image generators, content creation systems, and language models have dramatically altered the creative processes in the industry. On a daily basis I am presented with AI-driven technologies that replace creative practices I fought so hard to learn.
It is not that I am unwilling to adopt AI into my workflows, I have spent a considerable amount of time researching and learning how to best utilise it. However, it is the speed of technical innovation that I find difficult to process. I am finding AI technology hard to implement because if you blink it has been superseded by another emerging technology.
It is not like learning Adobe Creative Cloud or Affinity software that evolves relatively slowly and has a consistent user interface. AI software is constantly in flux, no sooner have you got used to a particular interface or functionality before it is irrevocably changed. At first I found these innovations inspiring but now I long for more consistency.
As a creative professional I am excited by the opportunities that AI technology presents. However, I will strive to find a balance between utilising AI-powered tools for efficiency, while continuing to practice and develop my own creativity. If I can achieve this, I think it will offer the best of both worlds.
At Unicorn Studios we have graphic designers, UI/UX designers, illustrators, bloggers, and social media content creators. Some have actively embraced the new AI technologies whilst others have chosen not to alter their creative practices.
AI will no doubt present some professional opportunities and challenges in the future but they will be best optimised and faced within a creative community like the one at Unicorn Studios.
If you'd like to find out more about our coworking space, book a tour of the studio below.
© Unicorn Studios (Ipswich) Ltd.
All rights reserved.
UK company registration 12033476